We are incredibly still talking pipelines when the economic opportunities of a quick transition to clean energy are so alluring, so obvious. Where is the national leadership? 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has highlighted the importance of the transition to a clean energy economy in his Mandate Letters to eleven key ministers responsible for the environment, climate change, natural resources, economic development, international trade and science. There is no mention of fossil fuels by Trudeau except to phase out subsidies for the fossil fuel industry. So why are we still talking pipelines? (Rolly Montpellier ~ Editor for BoomerWarrior).

Why are we still talking pipelines, boomer warrior

Energy East would carry Tar Sands bitumen and raise emissions, contrary to Canada’s commitment in Paris to reduce GHG emissions. Credit: Anne Rippy via Getty Images.

The Paris Agreement is likely our last chance to save our world from the deadly ravages of irreversible and devastating climate change. Nations that met in Paris have recognized the urgency to act on this most critical issue of our time by agreeing to transition from fossil fuels to 100 percent clean energy. Industrialized nations, including Canada, have agreed to do so by 2050 and developing nations later in the century. So why are we still talking pipelines?

Still Talking Pipelines?

(The following article was originally published in the David Suzuki Foundation Blog).

With the December Paris climate agreement, leaders and experts from around the world showed they overwhelmingly accept that human-caused climate change is real and, because the world has continued to increase fossil fuel use, the need to curb and reduce emissions is urgent.

In light of this, I don’t get the current brouhaha over Kinder Morgan, Keystone XL, Northern Gateway or the Energy East pipelines. Why are politicians contemplating spending billions on pipelines when the Paris commitment means 75 to 80 per cent of known fossil fuel deposits must be left in the ground?

No Room for Business as Usual

Didn’t our prime minister, with provincial and territorial premiers, mayors and representatives from non-profit organizations, parade before the media to announce Canada now takes climate change seriously? I joined millions of Canadians who felt an oppressive weight had lifted and cheered mightily to hear that our country committed to keeping emissions at levels that would ensure the world doesn’t heat by more than 1.5 C by the end of this century. With the global average temperature already one degree higher than pre-industrial levels, a half a degree more leaves no room for business as usual [such as talking pipelines].

The former government’s drive to make Canada a petro superpower distorted the Canadian economy into greater fossil fuel dependence, with catastrophic consequences when the price of oil collapsed. The lesson should have been learned long ago: Heavy dependence on a single revenue stream like fish, trees, wheat, minerals or even one factory or industry is hazardous if that source suffers a reversal in fortune like resource depletion, unanticipated cost fluctuations or stiff competition.

Coal stocks have already sunk to the floor, so why is there talk of building or expanding coal terminals? Low oil prices have pushed oilsands bitumen toward unprofitability, so why the discussion of expanding this carbon-intensive industry? Fracking is unbelievably unsustainable because of the immense amounts of water used in the process, seismic destabilization and escape of hyper-warming methane from wells. Exploration for new oil deposits — especially in hazardous areas like the deep ocean, the Arctic and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other critical wildlife habitat — should stop immediately.

Pipeline arguments are especially discouraging, with people claiming Quebec is working against the interests of Alberta and Canada because the leadership of the Montreal Metropolitan Community — representing 82 municipalities and nearly half the province’s population — voted overwhelmingly to reject the proposed Energy East pipeline project, which would carry 1.1 million barrels of oilsands bitumen and other oil products from Alberta to refineries and ports in the east. Some have thrown out the anti-democratic and, frankly, anti-Canadian notion that because Quebec has received equalization payments it should shut up about pipeline projects.

National unity is about steering Canada onto a sustainable track and looking out for the interests of all Canadians. Continuing to build fossil fuel infrastructure and locking ourselves into a future of increasing global warming isn’t the way to go about it. Shifting to a 21st century clean-energy economy would create more jobs, unity and prosperity — across Canada and not just in one region — than continuing to rely on a polluting, climate-altering sunset industry. Leaders in Quebec should be commended for taking a strong stand for the environment and climate — and for all of Canada.

The Paris target means we have to rethink everything. Energy is at the heart of modern society, but we have to get off fossil fuels. Should we expand airports when aircraft are the most energy-intensive ways to travel? Why build massive bridges and tunnels when we must transport goods and people differently? The global system in which food travels thousands of kilometres from where it’s grown to where it’s consumed makes no sense in a carbon-constrained world. Agriculture must become more local, so the Peace Valley must serve as the breadbasket of the North rather than a flooded area behind a dam.

The urgency of the need for change demands that we rethink our entire energy potential and the way we live. It makes no sense to continue acting as if we’ve got all the time in the world to get off the path that created the crisis in the first place. That’s the challenge, and for our politicians, it’s a huge task as well as a great opportunity.

*

RollyRolly Montpellier is the Founder and Managing Editor of BoomerWarrior.Org. He’s a Climate Reality leader, a Blogger and a Climate Activist. He’s a member of Climate Reality Canada, Citizens’ Climate Lobby (Ottawa) and 350.Org (Ottawa), the Ethical Team (as an influencer)  and Global Population Speakout.

Rolly has been published widely in both print and online publications. You can follow him on FacebookTwitterLinkedin and Pinterest.

2 COMMENTS

  1. YES, end subsidies to the fossil fuel industries, STOP the dirty oil pipelines but I think you are fooling yourself about “clean, green, energy” that can produce electricity because there is no such animal, they ALL depend upon OIL & a high energy, high technology civilization & without affordable oil, natural gas & dirty coal, we won’t have that.
    It’s not “clean” or “green” because mining their raw material uses OIL & that’s dirty not “green”, their manufactured from OIL & that’s dirty not “green”, it’s manufacturing is dirty & not “green”, it’s transportation burns dirty bunker oil & that’s DIRTY & far from “green”.
    7.4 BILLION humans cannot ever be “sustainable”, not even Canada with it’s lower population is sustainable & the US is much more overpopulated than you.
    We waste HUGE amounts of energy & must drastically CUT our energy use, but we cannot cut it enough because we are totally dependent upon OIL for our very existence, cut out oil, coal & natural gas & most of us will freeze, starve & die in the dark!
    We have built a trap out of fossil resources & we are now trapped, there is no escape now.

    • Sheila – in the short term we do need oil to develop a lower carbon future. But as we develop and adopt new cleaner technologies, we will not have to use oil to mine resources or grow our foods or for transportation. There needs to be a transition. 50-100 years from now, we will have a more sustainable way of living on this planetif we can hold on long enough for this to happen.

      Our civilization will have to consume less and conserve more. Our very survival will depend on it. But more population may have a devastating effect on any strategy to escape our current “fossil fuel trap”. The world might see massive die-offs – there will not be enough fresh water and food for all. It’s a very precarious time for humanity.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here